To get an concept of the monetary toll excessive climate is taking up this nation’s agriculture trade, look no additional than the federal government of Saskatchewan’s books.
The prairie province had forecast a greater than $1 billion surplus for the fiscal 12 months ending March 31, 2024, however contemporary price range paperwork launched final month present that surplus has utterly evaporated, leaving Saskatchewan with an approximate $482 million deficit for the 12 months as an alternative.
The motive for this dramatic reversal? In giant half, drought and a ensuing enhance in authorities crop insurance coverage payouts.
It’s an instance of what some consultants say Canadians can count on to see extra of as local weather change pressures agricultural manufacturing. Taxpayer cash already helps the agriculture trade on this nation to the tune of billions of {dollars} every year, and a few say the invoice will go up as local weather change-driven pure disasters make it more durable for farmers to eke out a dwelling.
“We are going to see more droughts, more pests, the yields won’t be as good,” mentioned Guillaume Lhermie, director of the Simpson Centre for Food and Agricultural Policy on the University of Calgary.
“For me the question is, who should pay for that? I do foresee that government will be solicited more and more.”
In Canada, crop insurance coverage is obtainable to farmers in all provinces to assist cowl manufacturing losses within the occasion of pure hazards similar to drought, flood, extreme warmth or snow and extra.
It is a part of a set of enterprise threat administration applications, all collectively funded by the federal and provincial governments via what known as the Sustainable Canadian Agricultural Partnership.
But excessive climate — from drought to wildfires to “heat domes” to flash floods — has plagued farmers from coast to coast in recent times.
In Saskatchewan’s case, final 12 months’s drought situations strained crop manufacturing, leading to a year-over-year output lower of practically 11 per cent and forcing the provincial authorities to spend practically $1.2 billion greater than budgeted via its Ministry of Agriculture.
For the approaching 12 months, provincial Finance Minister Donna Harpauer mentioned in her current price range handle that because of the “challenging weather and soil conditions,” Saskatchewan is budgeting $431.7 million this 12 months — a 5.8 per cent enhance year-over-year — to make sure crop insurance coverage and different farm threat administration applications are totally funded.
It’s not the primary time drought has thrust a wrench into the province’s funds – in 2021, Saskatchewan farmers noticed one of many largest manufacturing declines within the province’s historical past (47 per cent year-over-year) attributable to excessive warmth and drought situations. The Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Program paid out a report $2.6 billion to farmers that 12 months to assist cowl their losses.
Financial information and insights
delivered to your e mail each Saturday.
Large crop insurance coverage payouts have been a problem in different provinces as nicely.
In Alberta, the provincial Crown company referred to as the Agriculture Financial Services Corp. paid out $2.1 billion in 2021 and $552 million within the 2022 crop 12 months, with drought because the main reason behind loss for the overwhelming majority of these claims.
AFSC has warned that Alberta farmers can count on to see larger crop insurance coverage premiums for the 2024 crop 12 months, primarily because of the program’s monetary losses in 2021 and 2022.
Above and past crop insurance coverage, Canada additionally has a federal-provincial-territorial catastrophe aid framework that may be triggered when farmers encounter “extraordinary costs,” similar to the additional feed prices ranchers in Western Canada have needed to pay in recent times as drought dries up their pasture lands.
For the three-year interval ending Dec. 31, 2023, greater than $1.4 billion was paid out to Canadian producers within the type of catastrophe aid beneath that framework, which known as AgriRecovery.
Keith Currie, president of the Canadian Federation of Agriculture, mentioned whereas the catastrophe aid funding is welcome, extreme climate occasions have gotten so commonplace that the whole system could should be re-evaluated. AgriRecovery, for instance, has been criticized as being too gradual to reply within the wake of a catastrophe — he mentioned it’s not unusual for farmers to attend months or perhaps a 12 months to obtain funding.
“When we look at events like the ‘atmospheric river’ that happened in B.C., the hurricane impacts that have gone on in Atlantic Canada, or even the smoke damage from wildfires and how that’s affected crops, we need better risk management programs to help farmers have some sort of assurance that they can survive these kinds of climate change impacts,” Currie mentioned.
While crop insurance coverage will at all times be crucial, mentioned Shannon Sereda, director of presidency relations for the trade group Alberta Grains, governments can mitigate in opposition to the monetary toll of utmost climate by stepping up funding in agricultural analysis.
“One of the best defences we have against climate change or extreme weather events is really investment in research,” Sereda mentioned, including science can cut back climate-related crop failure via improvements similar to the event of drought-resistant seed varieties.
Stewart Oke, who farms in central Alberta east of town of Red Deer — part of the province nicknamed “Hail Alley” for its repute for punishing storms — mentioned he “couldn’t operate” with out crop insurance coverage to guard him from sudden losses.
But whereas he acknowledged that this system is expensive for each producers and governments, he mentioned he believes it’s sustainable so long as investments in analysis and know-how hold tempo.
“With access to innovation, there’s a lot of things that we can do as producers that will help keep our risk at a controllable level,” Oke mentioned.
Lhermie, the University of Calgary professor, mentioned within the short-term, local weather change means governments can have no alternative however to pour extra money into the agriculture trade to assist it face up to excessive climate occasions.
In the longer-term, he urged governments could wish to contemplate making monetary assist for farmers conditional on sure environmental practices, similar to soil well being and biodiversity administration.
“You could technically say that if you want to be insured then you have to be a good steward of the land. That’s something that could be doable, in the future,” Lhermie mentioned.
“Because in Western countries, when these (agricultural disasters) happen, governments are intervening a lot — meaning they subsidize and cover the losses. But in the long run, that’s just not sustainable for government spending. It costs a lot of money.”
Why climate change on the farm means a high cost for Canadian taxpayers
