EXCLUSIVE: Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., instructed Fox News Digital on Monday that he’s a particular no vote on the Senate border and immigration deal coupled to assist for Israel and Ukraine — arguing that support to Israel ought to be siloed off individually and that President Biden already has the facility he wants to finish the border disaster.
“I’m a Hades no,” Scott stated when requested if he would assist the settlement launched on Sunday night and which can possible be voted on this week.
Senate negotiators launched the $118 billion supplemental spending deal bundle late Sunday, which incorporates funding for Ukraine, Israel and roughly $20 billion in funding for border and immigration-related issues.
IMMIGRATION ACTIVISTS, LIBERAL SENATE DEMS TRASH BORDER DEAL OVER LACK OF AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
It features a new border authority to permit Title 42-style expulsions when migration ranges exceed 5,000 a day over a 7-day rolling common, narrows asylum eligibility whereas expediting the method, supplies extra work permits for asylum seekers and funds a large enhance in staffing on the border, within the immigration courts and asylum places of work.
It is dealing with appreciable warmth from conservatives, together with within the Republican-controlled House, the place lawmakers have claimed the deal will regularize excessive ranges of unlawful immigration, whereas funding non-governmental organizations and provides authorized support to unlawful immigrants. Some on the left have additionally objected to the invoice as a result of its failure to incorporate a pathway to citizenship for some unlawful immigrants already within the U.S.
Scott slammed the invoice as “unsatisfactory and unnecessary” as he argued that Biden is already in a position to safe the border and not using a energy that Scott believes permits too many migrant crossings earlier than it’s activated. Biden has stated he cannot safe the border with out fixes to a “broken” immigration system and extra funding.
“I think it’s such a lie to think that Joe Biden needs Congress to act in order for him to secure the border,” Scott stated.
He additionally objected that the invoice is being coupled with $60 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel, saying these points ought to be debated and handed individually.
5 KEY DETAILS IN CONTROVERSIAL SENATE BORDER DEAL
“We’re going to spend $60 billion for Ukraine, and we already need accountability in the resources that we’re spending,” he stated. “What brought us to this point, the crisis in Israel, $14 or so billion. We are making a critical mistake in using our ally Israel’s crisis to put more money into Ukraine and less real attention on the border,” he stated.
“I’m thankful that we are finally having a conversation about the border, but it’s the wrong one. It should be in a silo. We should be fixing and securing our southern border, and the president of the United States can do that right now,” he stated. “He undid what [former President Donald] Trump secures for us. Joe Biden did it by himself. He literally shredded a secure border with his actions as president.”
Scott, who just lately ended his 2024 bid for president and backed Trump for his White House bid, stated that he would first care for Israel by itself, then have a standalone invoice to cope with the border disaster.
“It would actually acknowledge the fact that the vast majority of people coming across our border aren’t from Mexico,” he stated. “Literally, Chinese nationals are coming across our southern border at record numbers, we see 150 plus countries represented on our southern border. So if we were to do an effective job, we would have these in silo packages so that we could actually confront the problem facing this nation to include what I believe are sleeper cells in our nation, because …the Biden administration, they have not monitored who’s coming in our country with an 85% release ratio, with 10 million people coming in by the election.”
GOP SENATORS DEMAND ‘ADEQUATE TIME’ TO REVIEW BORDER SECURITY BILL
Scott contrasted that with the stance taken by the Trump administration, which he sees as a hit in controlling unlawful migration into the U.S.
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“The key was the desire to have a secure border number one,” he stated. “The second was the tenacity and the fortitude to take the necessary steps to secure our border, to include the Remain in Mexico policy, to include seeking asylum in a country that’s contiguous with yours, to include looking at putting more focus on Mexico’s other border, not our border, and of course, the, codifying a wall and the funding for it,” he stated.