For greater than a decade, architect Julio Ñanco Antilef has campaigned to rewrite Chile’s structure, a relic from when General Augusto Pinochet dominated the nation as a navy dictator.
But now, as Chile prepares to vote on a brand new draft, Ñanco Antilef finds himself in a paradoxical place: hoping to maintain the previous model in place.
“It’s not that we are defending Pinochet’s constitution. It’s just that this proposal is worse,” he advised Al Jazeera in a latest interview.
A member of the Democratic Revolution get together, Ñanco Antilef was one of many few left-wing representatives to take part within the Constitutional Council that drafted the brand new model, which is ready to go earlier than voters on Sunday.
Rather, it was Chile’s far-right Republican Party that led the drafting course of, holding 22 of the council’s 50 seats.
The outcome, critics say, is a draft that favours right-wing priorities on the expense of traditionally marginalised teams, together with Chile’s Indigenous peoples.
“It is tied to a business model and favours individual interests rather than collective ones,” mentioned Ñanco Antilef, himself of Indigenous Mapuche descent.
Now, he and different Indigenous Chileans are pushing for voters to reject the draft structure, even when which means the nation might be caught with the Pinochet-era model for the foreseeable future.
“We are 13 percent of the population,” mentioned Alihuén Antileo Navarrete, a Mapuche lawyer elected to signify Chile’s Indigenous peoples on the council.
He argues the draft structure intentionally “excludes” Indigenous voices from authorities.
“The text does not ensure that we have institutional representation, neither in Congress nor in the Senate, and it ignores our historical demands to respect our ancestral territories,” Antileo mentioned.

A historical past of inequality
Sunday’s referendum would be the second time in as a few years that Chileans have gone to the poll field to weigh a brand new model of the nation’s structure.
President Gabriel Boric indicated it could even be the final alternative to swap out the Pinochet-era structure for the rest of his four-year time period.
“Whatever the result that the people choose, that process will come to an end,” Boric mentioned at a summit of world leaders final month.
The historical past of the present structure stretches again to 1980, when Pinochet — a ruler who oversaw the mass abduction and execution of his left-wing critics — appointed a authorities fee to draft a authorized framework to formalise his authority.
Ñanco Antilef grew up throughout the dictatorship within the Nineteen Eighties. “There was a strong repression. We didn’t even go out on the patio of our house because police would throw tear gas. It was a situation of fear. I remember they shot a neighbour dead. These are the memories I have of that time.”
Living in a low-income neighbourhood on the periphery of the capital Santiago, Ñanco Antilef additionally witnessed inequality that he now credit to Pinochet’s right-wing mannequin of governance.
“It allowed people who had resources to maintain their privileges, and for the people who didn’t, it was difficult to obtain a higher quality of life. I was only able to go to higher education because I won grants and got help from others,” he mentioned, including: “Pinochet’s constitution generated a very individualistic society.”
The 1980 structure has been criticised not just for its undemocratic origins but in addition for enshrining Pinochet’s rigidly conservative values in Chilean legislation.
Opponents say that, regardless of quite a few amendments, the structure nonetheless curtails social welfare programmes in favour of defending free-market values. It additionally fails to acknowledge Chile’s Indigenous teams, which comprise an estimated 2.2 million individuals.

A story of two drafts
Concerns over social welfare in the end simmered into widespread anti-government protests in 2019. Millions of Chileans flooded the streets, voicing a spectrum of calls for, together with requires higher public healthcare, fairer entry to schooling, abortion rights and pension reform.
Many protesters singled out Pinochet’s structure as the foundation explanation for the discontent. That prompted Chile’s authorities to carry a referendum in 2020 to determine whether or not to ditch the previous constitution and write a brand new one.
The voters got here again with an amazing response: 78 % accepted of the proposal, and a plan to reimagine the structure was hatched.
But the primary try floundered. Written by a Constitutional Council comprised largely of left-wing leaders and independents with no political expertise, the 2022 draft was seen as prolonged, complicated and overly progressive. It failed on the poll field, with 62 % of voters rejecting it.
In May, one other election was held to find out who would write the second draft. This time, voters turned to the conservative proper.
“After [the] progressive movement, there was a regression and fear of change,” Claudia Heiss, the pinnacle of political science on the University of Chile, mentioned of the swing rightward.
She believes the draft on Sunday’s poll enshrines values and concepts that “don’t belong in a constitution”, by recognising “patriotic symbols” and defending “the patriarchal conception of society and traditional gender roles”.
Among essentially the most controversial additions is an article that seems to acknowledge the rights of “life of those who have yet to be born” — language that would tighten Chile’s already restrictive abortion legal guidelines.

Draft prompts Indigenous considerations
But Indigenous rights supporters additionally see Sunday’s draft as a step backwards, after the promise of the primary rewrite try.
The first draft envisioned Chile as a “plurinational” nation, “composed of various nations” that recognised Indigenous rights to autonomy and self-governance.
The second model, nevertheless, defines Indigenous teams as “part of the Chilean nation, which is one and undivided”.
The variety of Indigenous representatives on the second Constitutional Council was additionally curtailed. Indigenous candidates needed to obtain no less than 1.5 % of the overall vote to have a seat on the council. Only one, Antileo, certified.
By distinction, the primary council included 17 seats for Indigenous teams, distributed in line with inhabitants measurement. The Mapuche, Chile’s largest Indigenous inhabitants, got seven seats, whereas the Aymara got two. Eight different Indigenous teams — the Atacameño, Colla, Quechua, Yagán, Kawésqar, Chango, Diaguita and Rapa Nui — got one seat every.
Experts like Salvador Millaleo, a Mapuche lawyer and tutorial on the University of Chile, indicated that the brand new constitutional draft’s shortcomings are a part of a protracted custom of Indigenous marginalisation.
“Chile has a terrible relationship with its Indigenous people,” Millaleo mentioned. “We need rules that establish an equal distribution of development opportunities where ancestral grounds are recognised, and the cultural patrimony of Indigenous people is protected, respected and guaranteed.”
He defined that Sunday’s constitutional draft solely mentions Indigenous rights in an “abstract” means, by saying the legislation “could” embody Indigenous illustration in Congress.
The new draft would additionally strengthen Pinochet’s governance mannequin, upholding neoliberal rules which might be at odds with Indigenous values, Millaleo mentioned.
“For example, the idea that nature is not an object but a subject that needs to be cared for — that’s not in the current [constitution], but the new proposal goes even further away from that.”

Voter fatigue excessive
That Indigenous viewpoint, nevertheless, runs opposite to lots of Chile’s enterprise pursuits.
The nation is among the world’s high copper producers, and its economic system is hinged on useful resource extraction. Mining makes up about 58 % of the nation’s whole exports.
Fernando Hernandéz, a civil engineer who works within the mining sector, mentioned he plans to vote in favour of the brand new draft structure as a result of it protects Chile’s financial pursuits.
Land ought to “generate value, jobs and growth”, Hernandéz defined.
But like many Chileans, Hernandéz is sceptical of what a brand new structure can obtain. And after practically three years of constitutional votes and councils, fatigue is setting in.
“Chile won’t transform from one day to another by changing the constitution,” Hernandéz mentioned. “This has been exhausting for Chile and for its people.”
Ñanco Antilef, the architect who participated within the Constitutional Council, agreed that voter enthusiasm is waning. “There’s electoral fatigue and less interest in the process this time around.”
But he insisted that voting was nonetheless necessary, if solely to guard the established order — and maintain out hope for a greater deal sooner or later for Indigenous Chileans.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/12/15/indigenous-advocates-reject-chiles-new-draft-constitution-ahead-of-vote?traffic_source=rss