Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
For those who work in the wealth industry, the definition of what makes an ultra-high-net worth individual — UHNW in industry parlance, super-rich to the rest of us — is changing. As the earnings of people who work in sectors such as technology and entrepreneurship has risen, so has “the bar for what it means to be ultra-wealthy”, says David Gibson-Moore, president of consultancy Gulf Analytica in an interview with the FT.
Possessing at least $30mn — one established measure — “doesn’t carry the same weight or exclusivity it once did”, Gibson-Moore added. “The ultra-rich today are being measured by new standards, with some financial commentators now suggesting $100mn is the new yardstick for anyone who wants to keep their head held high at private equity parties.”
Charlie Wells, managing director of the high-end estate agent Prime Purchase, agrees: “Forty years ago, a millionaire with a Rolls-Royce may have been the epitome of wealth. But, thanks to inflation, the numbers are constantly growing. Only recently, someone worth £20mn-plus would have been considered very wealthy but now you need £50mn-plus to be truly UHNW.”
It’s also due to a jump in wealth creation: data from consulting group Capgemini shows that since 2016 the number of individuals with $30mn has increased by more than a third. Cryptocurrencies and NFTs have added their own complexities.
So how would you define being super-rich: $10mn? $30mn? $100mn? Tell us your views by voting in our reader poll or commenting below the line.
Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.
https://www.ft.com/content/5bbe2542-7eca-474e-9c12-6d4f0cfa1279
