This article is part of The Next Generation series. As the greats, such as Roger Federer, Serena Williams and Rafael Nadal become the past, and Carlos Alcaraz and Iga Swiatek handle the present, The Athletic explores the next generation: the rising stars who will be tasked with securing tennis’ future.
Over the last seven years the ATP Next Gen Finals has established itself on the tennis calendar. There was a lot of excitement when it began in 2017 in Milan, as a way of showcasing the eight best players aged 21 and under from the season just gone, while trialling different rules and innovations that might then graduate to the main ATP Tour.
The tournament was the first to use electronic line calling and a video review system, while the scoring system is unique — five sets of first to four games, with a tiebreak at 3-3 in each set. The idea is to have fewer games with less at stake, and more games at the “business end” of sets.
The rules have been slightly tweaked for 2024, with the age cut-off now 20 instead of 21, in recognition of the fact that players like Carlos Alcaraz and Holger Rune have made their breakthroughs earlier than was typical at the tournament’s inception. When the Finals started in 2017, with the Big Three of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic still so dominant, it was rarer for players to make their mark when aged 21 or under.
This year’s event also has a different time slot, moving from early December last year to December 18-22 — meaning it will act almost as a pre-season event for 2025 (with the first events of next year’s season starting on December 27 and December 30). As with last year, the tournament will be held in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
For now, the eight qualifiers remain unknown, but several players are already in a strong position. More broadly, the ATP Next Gen Finals is approaching an inflection point. In the slow absence of the Big Three, whether through retirement or the loosening of their grip on the sport’s biggest prizes, how the event will evolve — and the nature of its role within the tennis ecosystem — are both up for debate. And outside of men’s tennis, how likely is an equivalent event on the women’s side, and where might that happen?
GO DEEPER
Tennis usually passes the torch. Carlos Alcaraz is running away with it
Starting with the question around who will qualify, the man comfortably leading the race to Jeddah is the hugely talented Frenchman, Arthur Fils. The 20-year-old has perhaps not exploded quite as quickly as some expected, but it’s still been a year that has seen him reach the Wimbledon fourth round, and win his first 500-level ATP event — beating Alexander Zverev in the German’s home country in a tense Hamburg final two months ago.
Next in the race is America’s Alex Michelsen, who was beaten by Jannik Sinner in the U.S. Open second round last month. The 20-year-old Californian is up to a career-high ranking of No. 47 after a hugely promising summer in which he reached the finals in both Newport, Rhode Island, and Winston-Salem, N.C., as well as the quarters at the Citi Open in Washington, D.C.
Coming up behind them are Shang Juncheng (19, from China), Jakub Mensik (19, from the Czech Republic) and Luca Van Assche (20, from France). All three of those players have reached Grand Slam third rounds this year. Shang, known as Jerry, and Mensik are ranked inside the world’s top 70 and are pretty safe bets to make Jeddah, while Van Assche is just outside the world’s top 100.
Below him come the three players currently in the qualification spots, separated by just 79 points. They are Joao Fonseca of Brazil (18), the American, Learner Tien (18), and Lithuania’s Vilius Gaubas (19). Fonseca and Tien have each garnered plenty of attention in 2024 for eye-catching results in Rio and Winston-Salem respectively. Earlier in the year, Tien put together a 28-match winning streak between May and July, earning a wildcard for the U.S. Open in the process.
The players closest to pinching one of the last qualification spots are Portugal’s Henrique Rocha and Coleman Wong of Hong Kong (both 20). They are only 21 and 31 points respectively behind Gaubas.
Race to Jeddah | 2024’s best youngsters
Player
|
Age
|
Points
|
---|---|---|
1. Arthur Fils (France) |
20 |
1615 |
2. Alex Michelsen (USA) |
20 |
1016 |
3. Juncheng Shang (China) |
19 |
820 |
4. Jakub Mensik (Czech Republic) |
19 |
770 |
5. Luca Van Assche (France) |
20 |
425 |
6. Joao Fonseca (Brazil) |
18 |
365 |
7. Learner Tien (USA) |
18 |
318 |
8. Vilius Gaubas (Lithuania) |
19 |
286 |
9. Coleman Wong (Hong Kong) |
20 |
280 |
10. Henrique Rocha (Portugal) |
20 |
265 |
Had 21-year-olds still been eligible then another exciting Frenchman, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard, and Luca Nardi, who beat Novak Djokovic in Indian Wells earlier this year, would be in the qualification spots. As would America’s Zachary Svajda.
Even if those 21-years-olds were eligible, it still wouldn’t be a stellar lineup compared to the first edition, say, which in 2017 included Andrey Rublev, Denis Shapovalov, Daniil Medvedev and Borna Coric — all youngsters who had quite a bit of buzz around them. Likewise the two alternates Stefanos Tsitsipas and Frances Tiafoe.
In general, it’s been an event that has been a good indicator of future success. The winners of the Next Gen Finals have been Chung Hyeon, Tsitsipas, Sinner, Alcaraz, Brandon Nakashima and Hamad Medjedovic. Of those first four, two are multiple Grand Slam winners and future world No. 1s, one is a two-time major finalist, and even Chung has an Australian Open semifinal to his name despite a horrific run of injuries since his Next Gen title. Earlier this month a video from the 2019 event did the rounds, with Sinner alongside Tiafoe and Alex de Minaur, ahead of all three of them competing in the U.S. Open quarterfinals. Tiafoe made the semis; Sinner won the whole thing.
The ATP has been pleased with how the event has given young players exposure, with solid attendances in Milan when it was hosted there between 2017 and 2022. Unsurprisingly, Jeddah was more of a challenge last year.
The idea of a Next Gen has become a well-established concept in men’s tennis, and having an annual event is a way of solidifying that. The different scoring system, singles-only court, and innovations like headsets for the players to talk with their coaches give the finals a distinctive feel. The impressive list of former winners (and runners up like Rublev, De Minaur and Sebastian Korda) gives it credibility. And as long as players are progressing from the Next Gen Finals to the top echelons of the sport, and not leaping straight past the event to that stratosphere, the ATP considers it to have a worthwhile spot in the calendar.
There have been discussions about having such an event on the WTA Tour in Saudi Arabia, The Athletic has been told by well-placed sources who wish to remain anonymous to protect relationships, but nothing has been confirmed (and there certainly won’t be an event this year). In November, the WTA Finals will be hosted in the Saudi capital of Riyadh for the first of three editions there.
GO DEEPER
Saudi Arabia complete deal to host WTA Finals: The background, the backlash and the money
Should a Next Gen-type event happen, the WTA would have to make a decision on what the age cutoff should be. Typically WTA players have broken through quicker than ATP ones in part because generally women mature physically before men. As it stands though, there are currently only 11 players who are aged 21 and under in the top 100 (nine on the men’s side) and six players under 20 (four on the men’s side).
So an event for either age group would work fine without having to make it too young an age bracket which might feel like too much pressure too soon. That said, Coco Gauff would obviously skip a Next Gen-style event as she would qualify for the main WTA Finals.
The top 20 and under WTA players in 2024
Player
|
Age
|
Points
|
---|---|---|
1. Coco Gauff (USA) |
20 |
3968 |
2. Diana Shnaider (Russia) |
20 |
2156 |
3. Mirra Andreeva (Russia) |
17 |
1973 |
4. Linda Noskova (Czech Republic) |
19 |
1913 |
5. Ashlyn Krueger (USA) |
20 |
900 |
6. Erika Andreeva (Russia) |
20 |
625 |
7. Robin Montgomery (USA) |
20 |
469 |
8. Maria Timofeeva (Russia) |
20 |
456 |
9. Brenda Fruhvirtova (Czech Republic) |
17 |
368 |
10. Marina Stakusic (Canada) |
19 |
352 |
The WTA does also have some history with putting on this kind of event. Between 2014 and 2018, there were five editions of the Future Stars event, which showcased some of the best young talent in the game. These though were done by region and by invitation. In 2015, ahead of the WTA finals in Singapore, there were four 23-or-under players selected to take part. The parameters were that two of the players had to be from Asia-Pacific and the others had to be from the rest of the world. Nine years on, the selection has aged extremely well, with the quartet made up of Naomi Osaka, Zhu Lin, Caroline Garcia and Ons Jabeur. Osaka, who had just turned 18, won the event.
A modern-day equivalent would likely generate plenty of excitement, as it has done intermittently for the men’s event. Especially when genuine future stars like Alcaraz have been involved.
The Next Generation series is part of a partnership with CHANEL.
The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
(Top photo: Fiona Goodall / Getty Images)
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5771636/2024/09/21/atp-next-gen-finals-jeddah-future-wta/